For Reviewers
Review biomedical-AI research — without wasting your time.
We respect reviewers. Manuscripts reach you only after passing technical screening, you receive a focused brief, and your contribution is formally recognised. We are building a founding reviewer community now.
What we ask
- Substance over style. Manuscripts arrive technically clean — focus on methods, validity and significance.
- Fairness. Constructive, specific, respectful. No demands for gratuitous self-citation.
- Independence. Conflicts of interest are screened in advance and declared.
- Double-blind. Author and reviewer identities are protected.
What you receive
- A structured briefing per manuscript — scope context, three comparable published papers, the right reporting checklist, and the specific questions for the article type.
- Conflict-of-interest screening in advance — we screen for COI before inviting you, so you are never asked to assess work you cannot review impartially.
- A fair workload — a maximum of 2–4 reviews per year, load-balanced invitations, and no repetitive administrative work.
- A recognition certificate — formal acknowledgement of your review contribution for your record.
Founding reviewer community
We're assembling the board and reviewer pool now.
If your work is in privacy-preserving biomedical AI or AI-driven drug discovery, we'd like to hear from you.